>Okay, folks. It’s been pointed out to me that having links to my various posts with actual numbers might be helpful for people looking to linkspam people saying stupid things on the internet about games not being sexist. So I’m putting up this post just to collect the most useful stuff in one place. For the most part, what you’ll find here is numbers based on surveys of game artwork.
My original article about sexist depictions of women in gaming can be found here. In it, I surveyed art from MMOs, console games, CCGs, and tabletop RPGs and came up with detailed numbers of sexist depictions in various sources.
There is also a followup survey done of the relaunched galleries on the official WoW site after the release of the Cataclysm expansion. The survey is the first part in a series that also includes posts on why the numbers are misleading, unbalanced class depictions, and comparisons of good and bad character design.
It’s very probably that any of these links will be responded to with comments along the line of “but gaming is sexist against men too!”. You may want to link them to this post about why idealized figures are not the same as sexualized figures. (Do note that since I was pretty angry when I wrote that post, it’s likely that they will respond that I’m biased.)
Feel free to link to any of these posts if you feel like it. This post will be edited to add new links whenever I do something that includes actual numbers.
Go Make Me a Sandwich 
>Thanks for posting this up. I can usually keep tabs on all the posts, especially because I use an RSS reader so they're all there even when I'm offline, but this is very handy for finding the key links to show others or to recall some particular picture or finding you posted. The more (vaguely receptive) people who can get a look at your blog, the better — even when I sometimes don't quite agree with what you might say or your methods, it's always eye-opening, thought-provoking and still somehow humorous despite the usually serious or intense subject matter.
>Oh shit. Guess I should update this then. (Glad you find it useful!)