[Trigger/Content Warning for frank discussions of awful portrayals of rape]
This isn’t the post that I was going to write today.
Originally, I had been planning on writing about my experience facilitating a game (that I wrote) called Autonomy, which centers around forcing men to have an embodied experience of sexism and gender-based injustice. It was a powerful, cathartic, and borderline traumatic (in a good way!) experience that I do very much want to share.
But all of that was before a friend linked to this piece by Emma Boyle on Gadgette, in which she writes about the character Quiet in the new Metal Gear Solid: Phantom Pain, and the many and sundry ways that Quiet is very much not an empowered feminist-friendly character:
And now there are so many fucked up things about her design that I want to yell at the internet about! So very, very many fucked up things! Like:
- Quiet is arguably the least clothed female character in the MGS series (it’s a little hard to tell in this screenshot, but those are ripped nylons that Quiet is wearing, not pants), which is – frankly – sort of impressive, given how very not clothed many female characters in the MGS series are.
- Quiet doesn’t dress that way because she chooses to; she dresses that way because she has to. Her backstory is that she’s photosynthetic, so wearing clothes would LITERALLY SUFFOCATE HER. You know, BECAUSE SCIENCE.
- Speaking of BECAUSE SCIENCE, there is another character in the MGS series – The End – who is also photosynthetic, who does actually get to wear clothes. You know, on account of him not being a woman. (Funny, that.)
- Quiet also DOESN’T TALK. At all. Because really, isn’t it just so hard to objectify a woman when she goes and opens her mouth and reminds you that she’s a human being with thoughts, feelings, and an inner life of her own? Yeah. Better to have her just not talk at all.
- And let’s not forget the shit cherry on the shit sundae: the series creator, Hideo Kojima, tried to shame people who expressed concern about the problematic design of the character by saying that once the full story was released, critics would “feel ashamed of their words and deeds”. Because it’s important to not lose sight of the fact that of course people who are expressing criticism of a fictional character who embodies many problematic tropes are the bad guys, not the guy who actually created the character in the first place.
All of those things are fucked up, and any of them are things that I could easily get a full-length post out of. However, the thing that I am angriest about is the disturbingly scripted near-rape sequence that Quiet is only able to save herself from because sexualization:
At a later point in the game there’s a distressing scene where Quiet is attacked. Quiet is taken captive and dressed in prisoner clothing, which, in covering her skin, causes her to slowly suffocate. In this scene, a guard grabs Quiet by the throat and forces her head into a tank of water, holding her head under the surface until she stops resisting him. The camera zooms in on her lifeless face, holding there whilst the player can hear the sound of a zip being undone and Quiet’s clothing being removed. It’s with this removal of her clothing that Quiet’s skin is once again exposed and, able to breathe, she overpowers her attackers and escapes a grotesque rape. There’s a video, but we’re not going to link to it because it’s triggering and horrible. — Emma Boyle, Gadgette – A games company just came up with the worst excuse ever for their half-dressed female character
It’s bad enough that the BECAUSE SCIENCE that is used to justify Quiet being so undressed in the first place actually extends to the point that wearing clothes will actually kill her. Because as much as I hate choice feminism (“what I choose is automatically feminist because I identify as a feminist and I choose it”), that would still actually be better than a female character created by men whose only two choices are 1) wear revealing clothing or 2) die. But the near-rape on top of all that is, honestly, repellant. Repugnant. Horrifying.
And sadly, I’m pretty positive that Hideo Kojima thought that he was being “edgy” and “creative”. “Hey look! I set up a character who needs to expose skin to live, so that later when the villains think she is powerless and they want to victimize her they’re actually giving her what she needs to get the power to save herself! What a reversal! Hot damn, I am a genius!”
NO. NO YOU AREN’T. NOT EVEN A LITTLE BIT.
And here’s why:
RAPE IS NOT EDGY
“Edgy” is the word that a lot of (male) creators like to use when they describe work that contains rape or attempted rape as a plot point. But here’s the problem with that.
Work that is legitimately edgy is either at the forefront of a trend or the start of an entirely new trend. It is experimental or avant-garde, and by fucking definition definitely not mainstream.
Now I’m not sure if you’ve noticed, but rape is kind of an epidemic in our society, and it’s been that way for, I dunno, just about all of fucking human history. Still, one might be able to make a claim that art featuring rape was “edgy” if our media and culture actually recognized the horror of the prevalence of rape in our society and it was taboo to portray rape and sexual violence in art. But rape in media, especially geek media, is depressingly common.
And yet, there are all these creators, these male creators who think that using rape to make their work DARK and GRITTY somehow makes their work “edgy” – because somehow they all lose sight of the fact that GRIMDARK is the new mainstream. You see it from creators like Hideki Kamiya’s portrayal of Bayonetta as a sexually “empowered” and “liberated” woman who still suffers rape as a penalty for mechanical failure. Or George R.R. Martin’s Game of Thrones series, which is often touted as this revolutionary work of “realistic”, “edgy” “dark fantasy” – and yet everything about the books only reflects the power dynamics of patriarchy as it exists in the real world. Even Joss Whedon, whose work I am actually a fan of despite his tendency to fall into the same problematic traps regarding gender and race repeatedly, tried with Dollhouse to write a series that would be challenging and thought-provoking and wound up just being uncomfortably rapey.
In order to be truly, legitimately edgy, Phantom Pain would have to actively subvert and reverse common gender tropes and stereotypes. Instead, everything about the game, writing, and character design only serves to reinforce the status quo of patriarchy – which makes it about as far from edgy as it is possible to get.
RAPE IS NOT CREATIVE OR ORIGINAL
The reliance of geek writers on rape isn’t creative. Creativity is experimenting with new thoughts, ideas, and processes to create something original. It’s taking something familiar and using it in a way that it wasn’t intended for, or using it in a way that it’s never been used before. It’s throwing out ideas about how a problem “should” be solved and trying approaches that “shouldn’t” work just to see what happens. Creativity is not reaching for the same tool every time you have a problem that needs solving, even if that tool is not the ideal tool for the problem at hand. When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a nail. And the problem is that for a depressingly large number of (usually but not exclusively) male writers, their go-to hammer is rape.
But when the default answer to “I need to show this person is evil, how do I do that” is “rape”, that’s not creative.
When the default answer is “I need to have this female character had to have overcome adversity in the past, what is it that she has overcome” is “rape”, that’s not creative.
When the default answer to “I need this female character to suffer a setback, what should happen to cause that setback” is “rape”, that is not creative.
I could write thousands, if not tens of thousands of words about how unbelievably fucking common rape is in geek media. But I’ve already done that, or tried to, and I was only able to just barely scratch the surface. It would be entirely possible to devote this blog to only writing about rape in gaming, and I would still never run out of material because seriously gaming is legit kind of obsessed with rape and it’s depressing.
TL;DR: JUST DON’T FUCKING WRITE ABOUT RAPE
It’s to the point where my advice to creators is now – does your idea include rape? Great. Scrap it and start over. Because I have literally never seen an instance of rape in any piece of media that I have consumed that I would say was handled well.
Every time I have seen rape in a piece of media, it has been about deprotagonizing women, either by punishing them for being strong or explaining their strength by victimizing in their backstory. It is about reducing women to plot objects that can be violated for the sake of story whenever it is convenient.
And it’s always about the reactions OF THE MEN to the rape, and never about the victim’s experience and journey. What’s important when someone (almost always a woman) is raped in a piece of fiction is how that rape gives strength of conviction and tragic purpose to the male protagonist in achieving their Plot Objective. You never get to experience stories about the experiences of the victim, of trying to navigate a system that blames and re-victimizes women for their own rapes, or of trying to balance recovery with the expectations of how “good” victims should behave – expectations which are often at odds with what will actually help in recovering.
Even when you have a character get raped and then get revenge on their rapist, that is such a simplistic, reductive take on rape that just isn’t helpful. The reality of rape is that in many cases, women have social, practical, or emotional ties to their attackers and violently attacking or killing their rapist would only be further traumatizing. That sort of story line also comes with the implication that women who don’t want to lash out violently at their attacker feel that way because they are weak. And if they were truly strong and “empowered”, they would hurt their attacker just as bad as they themselves were hurt, if not worse.
So despite the fact that I’m really not a fan of blanket “just don’t write about [x] in [y]” type rules, I’m calling it. We’re done. We all had our chance and we proved we couldn’t handle the responsibility. So from now on, JUST DON’T FUCKING WRITE ABOUT RAPE.
11 thoughts on “Rape is not edgy, creative, or original [TW][CW]”
Yes! I am so sick of ‘rape as plot device’. I join you in saying “no more”!
‘rape’ has had me feeling uncomfortable since the hero in Thomas covenant series raped some girl after being dumped in a fantasy universe…its why I avoid reading the series…and by comparison game of thrones makes the Thomas covenant cycle look insufficiently rapey to even qualify as ‘edgy’.
But lets put it into context with the real world. I was reading about the us government plan to survive an alien invasion. After we loose and humans are driven to extinction women over a certain age are to be regarded as a threat to any repopulation plan which involves raping young women at the back of the cave…after reading that I thought: The dick that wrote that one needs a bullet in the back of his head.
I think photosynthetic skin isn’t even science, just bullshit. To be photosynthetic it would need a photosynthetic pigment which at the surface is usually alpha and or beta chlorophyll, which are green. So her skin would need to be leafy green for this to work.
Then, there’s the suffocation when skin is not exposed to sunlight, which is also bullshit because (science reason) the human body stores energy as fat and can also use muscle, not just as carbohydrates. She should have several weeks before any bad stuff starts happening for her wearing clothes even if we accept the bullshit photosynthetic premise in the first place.
Oh, and she’d need to eat regular food anyway since photosynthesis, while amazing, only supplies glucose, not any of the essential minerals, which is one of the reasons why plants have roots.
As if the idea wasn’t full of bollocks anyway.
There’s an even deeper, more essential problem, however, and that’s that photosynthesis isn’t respiration. We can pretty much call Quiet’s design as an introductory plant biology mistake.
While I am absolutely against rape being such a fucking common trope, I will say that it being used in Reign didn’t absolutely sicken me. Mary is a very strong character, but the show didn’t portray her as being weak after. She struggled with trying to deal with what happened to her. Hell, after the episode the actress herself came on for a brief PSA concerning what had happened in the episode.
I dunno. There may very well be folks who disagree with me, and that’s cool. I’m not even saying that it 100% justifies rape being used in the show, in the first place. But at least it didn’t leave me cringing all over the place, like anything even remotely related to Quiet does.
Thank you for this:
“Every time I have seen rape in a piece of media, it has been about deprotagonizing women, either by punishing them for being strong or explaining their strength by victimizing in their backstory. It is about reducing women to plot objects that can be violated for the sake of story whenever it is convenient.”
It really is true, and not just in gaming. Even something as well-regarded (especially in terms of female characterization) as Mad Men did it poorly — because it’s always done poorly. I won’t spoil specifically, but by season two, one of the minor characters had become the scene-stealer of the show by way of her interactions with the more major characters. However, she didn’t really have much of a story of her own. So they jump-started her personal story by raping her. It was just so stupid and obvious.
If Mad Men can’t get it right, you can’t either, so just don’t do it!
[…] same arguments, wundergeek of Go Make Me a Sandwich blog follows the train of thought through to the concept of rape and how it has ceased to be edgy a long time ago and we as a culture have proved we are not responsible to handle […]
What do you think about the depcition of rape in Far Cry 3? in this game the character is drugged then raped by a woman and we rescue a male friend from a sadist that has been raping him. This game is really the odd man out in this depiction. I can only think of other game with a male protagonist raped (one of the FEAR games).
Honestly, it’s not one that I’m familiar with, and I doubt that I’d be able to deal with seeking out clips with which to form an opinion currently.
Comments are closed.